There’s a CVE and no patch available because the version is end-of-life

The fix upstream lives several major versions ahead, if it exists at all. HeroDevs builds a secured version of the release you are already running, so the finding closes without an upgrade.

Angular 1.8.3 has a high-risk vulnerability CVE-2024-21490 affecting versions 1.3.0 to 1.8.3 with no patch.

There is no patched version to move to

Your scanner flags a CVE against a package in production. You go looking for the patched release and there isn’t one. The release line you are on reached end-of-life, and the advisory names a fixed version two or three majors ahead of where you sit.

So the finding stays open. It reappears on every scan, it shows up in the next audit, and it lands in the next security questionnaire a customer sends you. Nothing about it resolves on its own, because the party who would normally resolve it has moved on.

What breaks when upstream patches stop

Security

CVE open, no fix

Compliance

No evidence to show

Roadmap & budget

Forced migrations that risk the roadmap

Linux kernel version timeline showing versions 4.1.7 to 4.2.2 with CVE warnings and end-of-life notice.

Already know the CVE?

Search the vulnerabilities HeroDevs has remediated to see whether a secured version of your package already exists.

Severity
ID
Technology
Category
Version(s) Affected
Medium
.NET
Server-Side Request Forgery
Protection Mechanism Failure
Information Disclosure
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.43
High
.NET
Unchecked Input for Loop Condition
Denial of Service
Microsoft.NETCore.App >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.43
Medium
.NET
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests
Microsoft.NETCore.App >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.43
High
.NET
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Remote Code Execution
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.43
High
.NET
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.43
High
.NET
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.43
High
Node.js
Use After Free
22.x <= 22.23.1; 24.x <= 24.18.0; 26.x <= 26.5.0; All End-of-Life release lines, including 16.x, 18.x, and 20.x
Medium
Jackson
Denial of Service
>=2.15.0 <=2.18.5, >=2.19.0 <2.21.1
High
Angular
Cache Poisoning
>=22.0.0-next.0 <22.0.2, >=21.0.0-next.0 <21.2.19, >=20.0.0-next.0 <20.3.27, <=19.2.25
High
Angular
Cross-Site Scripting
<=19.2.25, >=20.0.0-next.0 <20.3.27, >=21.0.0-next.0 <21.2.19, >=22.0.0-next.0 <22.0.1
High
Denial of Service
<=20230618
Medium
Spring
Authorization Bypass
>=4.2.0 <=4.2.20, >=5.5.0 <=5.5.8, >=5.7.0 <=5.7.24, >=5.8.0 <=5.8.26, >=6.0.0 <=6.0.8, >=6.1.0 <=6.1.9, >=6.2.0 <=6.2.8, >=6.3.0 <=6.3.17, >=6.4.0 <=6.4.17, >=6.5.0 <=6.5.10
High
.NET
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Improper Input Validation (4.16)
System.Security.Cryptography.Xml >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.2
High
.NET
Improper Input Validation (4.16)
Stack-based Buffer Overflow
System.Security.Cryptography.Xml >= 6.0.0 <= 6.0.2
Critical
Rails
Information Exposure
activestorage < 7.2.3.2; >= 8.0, < 8.0.5.1; >= 8.1, < 8.1.3.1
Exclamation icon
No results found

The vulnerability you entered was not found in our directory.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

The Problem

Every path out costs more than the fix should

Upgrade to the version that has the fix

The patched release is a major version ahead, so this is a migration rather than an update: breaking changes across every call site, other packages pinned to the major you are leaving, and a full regression pass. Weeks of engineering, scoped and delivered to close one security finding.

Patch it yourself

Fork the project, backport the fix, and maintain that fork indefinitely. You now own code nobody outside your team reviews, and the next CVE on the same package is also yours to handle.

Generate the fix with AI

Fast, and increasingly common. Independent research finds that nearly half of AI-generated code introduces new vulnerabilities, and an unreviewed patch leaves an open question about who answers for it if it misses the vulnerability or breaks production

The Solution

HeroDevs maintains the release line the project left behind

We maintain a secured release inside the line you already run

HeroDevs engineers backport security fixes to a supported release in your version line, rather than asking you to move to the current major.

You change the dependency reference

The replacement is API-compatible, so application code does not change. If you sit behind the supported release, you bump up to it first, which stays inside the line you already run.

New CVEs keep getting patched

Covered packages fall under the NES 14-day CVE SLA, for as long as you run the software.

Why HeroDevs?

19M+

package versions tracked

1,000+

vulnerabilities remediated

900+

enterprise customers secured by HeroDevs

Statista logo

“Beyond the technical benefits, HeroDevs' solution delivered significant business value. We maintained our security posture without compromising our strategic roadmap, all while achieving substantial cost savings compared to a full migration”

Markus Wolf, Architect @ Statista

A pull request, and the evidence to close the finding

Evergreen Platform screenshotCode repository view showing Compliance folder with JSON and PDF files including one marked Not Affected.

What security and compliance teams ask

Get answers to some of our most commonly asked questions.
Of course, if you can't find the answer you're looking for, feel free to contact us.

Is this a fork of the project?
Do I have to change any application code?
How quickly do you patch a new CVE?
What if the framework I need isn’t supported yet?
How do I show this to an auditor?
What if the whole project is end-of-life, not just my version?
Does this lock me out of migrating later?

Something not covered here? Talk to an expert.

Find out whether the framework you’re stuck on is already supported