Thought Leadership
Sep 9, 2025

The Hidden Security Risks of Outdated JavaScript Testing Frameworks (and How to Avoid Them)

Why outdated devDependencies like Jest, Mocha, and Cypress can expose your CI/CD pipelines to CVEs, compliance failures, and operational risks—and how to secure them.

Give me the TL;DR
The Hidden Security Risks of Outdated JavaScript Testing Frameworks (and How to Avoid Them)
For Qualys admins, NES for .NET directly resolves the EOL/Obsolete Software:   Microsoft .NET Version 6 Detected vulnerability, ensuring your systems remain secure and compliant. Fill out the form to get pricing details and learn more.

Enterprises rely on automated testing frameworks to keep their software delivery pipelines moving. Tools like Jest, Mocha, Cypress, and Playwright are deeply embedded in CI/CD workflows, validating every build before release. Because these frameworks are classified as “devDependencies,” they’re often assumed to be low risk.

But in modern enterprise environments, that assumption doesn’t hold up. Testing frameworks run in privileged CI/CD environments, with access to credentials, build artifacts, internal APIs, and deployment systems. When those frameworks reach end-of-life (EOL) and stop receiving security patches, they can become an unexpected weak link in the software supply chain.

Enterprise Impact

Outdated testing frameworks create three categories of problems:

  • Security: EOL frameworks carry unpatched CVEs in their dependency chains. Because they run in privileged CI/CD contexts, exploiting them provides attackers with direct access to secrets and infrastructure.

  • Operations: Old frameworks often fail on newer Node.js versions or browsers, leading to skipped or unreliable test results. This creates a false sense of security in test coverage.

  • Compliance: Many compliance frameworks (ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA) require evidence of active patch management across the software stack. Ignoring testing frameworks in this process can raise red flags during audits.

Real Security Risks

Jest and node-notifier

Jest v26 integrated node-notifier for desktop test result notifications. Unfortunately, node-notifier 8.x contained a command injection vulnerability (CVE-2020-7789). Unsanitized input could break out into the shell, allowing arbitrary code execution.

In a CI/CD pipeline, a malicious dependency or test fixture could inject a payload into a test name, which Jest would then forward to node-notifier. That payload could exfiltrate sensitive environment variables like $SECRET_ACCESS_KEY or $TOKEN. While the framework itself wasn’t malicious, its outdated dependency created a real attack path.

Mocha and growl

Older versions of Mocha bundled the vulnerable growl package (CVE-2017-16042), exposing test environments to remote code execution. As a result, enterprises that remained on Mocha v3 exposed their CI/CD pipelines to remote code execution on every build, creating a persistent, unpatched attack surface.

The event-stream incident

In 2018, the popular npm package event-stream was compromised when a malicious package was added as a dependency (for more details). This new package contained obfuscated code designed to steal Bitcoin wallet credentials from applications that used it. The code only executed in certain environments, but it demonstrated the feasibility of supply chain attacks on “low-risk” packages. If such a dependency was included in a test framework, it could just as easily have been executed during CI runs.

Strategies for Managing the Risk

Many enterprises fall behind on testing framework upgrades because they view these tools as “just devDependencies”. Teams freeze versions to stabilize pipelines and delay migrations to avoid test refactoring. The reality is that devDependencies are part of the software supply chain. If they introduce vulnerabilities, they can be exploited in CI/CD just like production dependencies.

Beyond dependency hygiene, enterprises should also strengthen the environments where these tools run. Harden CI/CD pipelines by running tests in isolated, ephemeral containers with minimal secrets exposed. This way, even if a compromised dependency executes, the blast radius is limited.

Finally, enterprises that cannot immediately migrate off EOL frameworks still have options. HeroDevs provides Never-Ending Support (NES) for open source packages that have reached end-of-life, delivering security fixes so organizations can continue using critical tools safely while planning their migrations. For enterprises balancing stability with security, NES support helps bridge the gap.

Table of Contents
Author
Shelby Kelley
Senior Software Engineer
Open Source Insights Delivered Monthly